Examining Belarus’ Growing Dependence on Russia


After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Belarus was the rare ex-Soviet state to remain strategically aligned with the Russian Federation. In 1999, Russia and Belarus reached an agreement to become a “state-union”, which aimed to create a USSR-like federation with a government, currency, flag and army. Over the past two decades, the Unionist state has mainly aimed at economic integration, with efforts also in the defense and intelligence sectors. This agreement is part of Moscow’s efforts to re-establish regional hegemony in the former Soviet space by concluding new alliance agreements. The formation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CTSC), a Russian-led intergovernmental military alliance of certain states of the former Soviet Union that provides collective defense for its members, was also part of this strategy. Minsk’s poor relations with the West in recent years, mainly due to human rights violations, have motivated a new proximity to Moscow. The European Union imposed economic sanctions on Belarus following the 2020 presidential election which was widely viewed as corrupt, solidifying the end of previously friendly political relations. The growing unity between Moscow and Minsk isolates Belarus from Western countries, resulting in increased dependence and commitment to Russia’s strategic goals.

Since the election of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in 1994, the importance of Russia to the country’s economy has increased significantly. Inexpensive oil and gas exported from Russia account for 15% of Belarus ” Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and Russia represents 41% from Belarusian exports. During times of escalating tensions between Russia and the West, Belarus has served as a “intermediate” importing goods from the European Union, labeling them as “Belarusian” and re-exporting them to Russia, and vice versa. The relationship, however, is not completely symbiotic. Russia needs Belarus as an ally for energy trade, as the pipeline through the country is one of the only reliable carriers of energy resources from Russia to Europe left for Moscow to use.

These seemingly good relations came with their share of tension: multiple disputes led the two parties to interfere in each other’s markets. After Belarus violated a pipeline deal with Russia in the mid-2000s, Russia raised gas prices and reduced throughput, producing less gas for higher prices. prices. In response, Belarus increased transit charges and extracted gas destined for other countries. Russia then raised prices again, forcing Belarus to sell 50% of the pipeline back to the Russian energy company Gazprom. Belarus’ economic dependence on Russia prevents it from setting tighter borders with Moscow. Lukashenko’s previous policy was to keep Russia at bay while maintaining close ties.

Previous cordial relations between Belarus and the West have largely deteriorated due to Belarusian corruption and human rights violations. The fraudulent 2020 presidential election in Belarus sparked riots and the illegal imprisonment of protesters. The Lukashenko regime has since cracked down on democratic movements, sending hundreds of people into exile and putting thousands in prison. He sadly detained journalists Raman Pratasevich and Sofia Sapega after illegally landing a Ryanair flight in Minsk in May 2021. This caused conflicts with other countries when the plane landed for “security reasons”. The two journalists were charged with breaking Belarusian law, but it was not known which law, and no further explanation was released for their detention. The Belarusian government claimed that it was a ” precautionary measure “, but its lack of transparency and respect for international standards angered Western observers. Tensions have also increased due to an immigration crisis provoked by Belarus and imposed on Lithuania and Poland; Belarus illegally pushed thousands of Iraqi migrants into the two countries, forcing them to declare the state of emergency. Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki declared these actions “a diplomatic conflict” and “an attempt to violate the integrity of the Polish state, the sovereignty of our limits. “

Given the deterioration of political relations, Belarus is now isolated from the West. This isolation forced Lukashenko to end up in a corner, making him fully compliant and willing to meet Russia’s needs for Support. This situation prompted Lukashenko to remove the neutrality clause from the Belarusian constitution in July 2021, publicly displaying his full allegiance to Russia. Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly backed the decision, saying the constitutional impeachment was Belarus “publicly renouncing any obligation to the West and demonstrating its full involvement in Moscow’s strategic strategy.” priorities. “On August 30, Putin declared that Russia can” always count on Belarus for Support.On September 13, the two presidents announced plans for further economic integration under the slogan “two countries, one economy. ”

Despite the asymmetric power dynamic, Lukashenko put Putin to the test by publicly opposing Russian actions in Ukraine and Crimea. Lukashenko called Russia’s annexation of Crimea “a bad precedent being created.In the past, Lukashenko’s attempts to improve diplomatic relations with the West by freeing political prisoners, easing media restrictions, and welcoming members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to discuss of the Ukrainian war angered the Kremlin. Despite this “rebellious” behavior, Belarus received no real punishment from Russia because of the need for Moscow to make it an ally. Russia’s deteriorating foreign relations force the Kremlin to depend on Belarus as an ally. With the Zapad-2021 military exercises, it is clear that Russia’s goal is to exercise greater control over Belarus, and Belarus appears to be complying with it.

The Zapad-2021 Joint military exercises between Belarus and Russia, further support Russia’s integration plans. The exercises presented a scenario in which Russia defends Belarus against attacks from “Nyaris, Pomoria and the Polar RepublicWhich are aliases for Lithuania, Poland and a Scandinavian country. In the exercises, Belarus “responds” to Western-backed terrorists causing instability linked to Lukashenko’s earlier claims that protests against his election are pretexts for a planned invasion of Belarus by NATO. The exercises took place in two phases, the first to divert NATO intervention and the second to stabilize a situation involving terrorists supported by the West. These exercises also included an integrated air and missile defense system in Grodno and a reassignment of Belarusian soldiers to Russian districts via Russian military commander Anatoly Sidorov. suggestion. In addition, Russia has created a special forces unit that includes four Belarusian brigades. Russia not only wanted to prepare for aggression against the West, but also wanted to demonstrate its military prowess in collaboration with Belarus.

Although Belarusians have continued to protest against the deepening of Russian-Belarusian military ties, Russian armed forces expert Michael Kofman says “it is in Minsk’s interest to invite a much larger Russian imprint. diet. “Although there is no permanent military base yet, Putin has been lobbying Belarus since 2015. Lukashenko’s new dependence on Russia could lead to the creation of a permanent military base, proposed by Putin , which is expected to be detained in Babyrusk and contain an SU-27 fighter. jets. While integration is the ultimate goal, continued instability in Belarus is seen as an unwelcome inconvenience by Moscow, as Lukashenko’s anger towards his neighbors could lead to an accidental explosion. While troops were stationed in Belarus before Zapad, more remained after the exercises. Now, a larger Russian contingent remains in Belarus, and Russian troops are much closer to the border with Poland than ever before, indicating that this joint exercise could become more permanent than a military exercise. Belarus’ independence has slowly waned as Russia’s military presence expands and could mark the end of sovereignty previously enjoyed.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a non-partisan organization that seeks to publish reasoned and policy-oriented articles on US foreign policy and security. national. priorities.

Source link


Leave A Reply